You can start making money right away click here

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Bad backlinks kill search engine rankings

Bad backlinks kill search engine rankings. Website owners and SEO companies know this. Still, some small business owners have spent $100,000 to plant weeds in their Internet gardens.

If your site was among the 2.3 percent of English-U.S. queries penalized by Penguin 2.0 on May 22, you're facing the arduous task of pulling all those backlink weeds from your site. But ridding your site of the types of links Google considers spam won't automatically improve your rankings. You'll have a nice clean site but not nearly as many backlinks. The temptation to quickly add as many backlinks as possible will be hard to resist.

Fight the urge. Keep the weeds out and don't plant anymore. If this is the first time your site has been hit by a change in a Google algorithm, you might think "what's the harm?" in adding a few paid links to move your page up in the search engine rankings.

Learn from these two expensive examples of website owners who made the mistake of trying to fool Google not once but twice. Neither was a salacious or travel site - two types of websites hit hard by Penguin 2.0. Both were ordinary businesses looking to fast-track their way to page one Google rankings.


From Page One to Pluto
The first example was a retail site with revenues of about $2 million annually. For the sake of keeping the company’s Google woes private, we’ll call it Business A. In 2011, Business A’s site consistently ranked on page one or two of Google for its main keywords — or money words. When Google’s first Penguin algorithm rolled out, the company took a hit and disappeared into the Internet backwoods.
The owners hired a new SEO company and spent about $8,000 a month to “get us back to page one.” It took about five months, but Business A’s rankings steadily climbed and the company was back on page one, in the top five listings for its very competitive keywords.
They didn’t reach page one legitimately – paid links and keyword stuffing were involved — but vowed to maintain their ranking by adding quality content to their site and pursuing guest posts and other Google-friendly backlinks.
Both Company A and its SEO provider had good intentions but, when it proved time consuming to land guest posts and add content, both looked for shortcuts. For another six months, they paid for links and reviews — repeating all the mistakes that had gotten them in trouble the first time. Company A was happy. It could afford to spend $100,000 when they were making record sales. Although Company A’s budget included $3,000 a month for content, much of it went unused. The SEO Company didn’t see a need to spend money on expensive content when cheap tricks seemed to work just fine.
Company A didn’t mind — or didn’t pay attention — because it was getting what it wanted — Page 1 Google rankings. And it was too busy counting up sales to care how those rankings were obtained.
But then Penguin 2.0 hit and the company’s site wasn’t back in the backwoods — it was banished to the Web’s equivalent of Pluto.
Now both Company A and its SEO provider are frantically trying to clean up the mess and get back to page one of Google ASAP. And both are thinking about planting weeds again, each hoping to make enough money to make it worth the penalty they will inevitably face again.
Maybe the risk the companies took was worth it. Both made money between Penguin/Panda updates. But Company A is now losing money and the SEO provider might lose an important client as a result.
One hundred thousand dollars would have bought Company A tons of high-quality content and backlinks that were Google-proof.
Hopeless Cause
The case of Company B, a business consultancy firm, is sadder. Company B paid less money – about $80,000 – to its SEO provider but never got close to a page one ranking. The company was trying to rank for keywords that Fortune 100 brands dominated. No amount of shoddy links would elevate the company to its desired position.
But Company B thought it was making progress, thought it would eventually reach page one – the SEO Company kept assuring this would happen – until Penguin 2.0 reduced its traffic from about 200 daily visitors to 30.
At least two-thirds of Company B’s backlinks need to be removed. And if the company has a chance of achieving its desired rankings, it will have to start over with new keywords and a new strategy.
Five Types of Fertilizer to Grow Traffic and Search Engine Rankings
Whether you’re newly stung by a Google penalty or waiting for the next one to hit, now is the time to clean up your SEO tactics and start growing your website business in ways the search engines will reward.
Whatever your marketing budget, there’s no getting around the facts that content-poor, spammy and neglected sites will never win the ranking wars. Victory will go to sites that earn their authority and traffic by demonstrating value.
Few companies can afford to waste money on marketing strategies that have been proven damaging. So pledge to make Google your best friend – and Bing so envious it will boost your rankings too — by adopting safer, but surer methods.
Here are five to get you started on the path to higher rankings that will weather any algorithm storm:
1. Get Serious About Guest Posts.
If a high-authority website links back to yours, the link glory goes to you. Writing guest posts is one of the most cost-effective ways to obtain valuable backlinks even if you hire a writer or content marketing firm to help.
Successful guest posting requires two main things: consistent outreach and great content. Query site owners and editors whose audience closely matches – or includes – your own. Write a compelling query letter that demonstrates your knowledge of your subject matter and the guest host’s needs. (Read articles and blog posts on the site before querying.)
I’ve written a primer on how to become a successful guest poster. You can read it here. If you’re already writing guest posts but want to improve your success, this HubSpot article discusses the advantages of co-marketing.
2. Join Groups of Like-Minded Business Owners.
Google+ and Facebook make it easy to join groups with ecommerce owners whose interests are similar to yours. In addition to sharing your experience with each other, you can also exchange links. The link will prove more valuable if it comes from a guest post and not an embedded link on each other’s home page.
It’s easy to exchange a guest post with someone whose need for a backlink is as great as yours. Just do your homework about the site first. Check out the metrics before suggesting a trade. But don’t be a snob about this. A freely-exchanged backlink with a compatible business owner is better than a paid link from any site.
3. Make Friends with Journalists.
Reporters always need sources for their stories. Become a reliable, interesting source and you’ll get ongoing publicity – and links – to your site. Companies such as Help a Reporter Out make it easy to connect with both traditional and online writers. Keep in mind, though, that your pitches will compete with those made by highly paid public relations specialists on behalf of their clients.
So be persistent. Follow the rules of pitching etiquette and don’t give up if your first few efforts are ignored. Another way to get a journalist’s attention is to comment on his articles and follow him in social media. Show your interest in a reporter and she’ll be responsive to your story requests. After commenting on a few of the writer’s articles, send a personal note and explain your expertise.
4. Create Online Profiles with Reputable Companies.
Online profiles help your company get seen, which helps it gain traffic, which helps improve your ranking. Pay for profiles if membership is a privilege – the Better Business Bureau, for example – and not just a moneymaking proposition for the company.
You can also post free profiles with companies such as Forbes and The New York Times. By connecting with prestigious companies – and improving your profile by frequently commenting on articles – you enhance your own authority. Don’t dismiss such opportunities because the links are no-follow rather than do-follow. When you boost your reputation, a boost in your rankings will follow.
5. Network on Social Media.
Even if you don’t like joining groups, you can use social media to connect with other website owners. Share what works – and doesn’t – in your link-building efforts and form alliances with professionals with whom you share a common bond: the desire to increase your visibility on the Internet. It takes fewer than five minutes – and not a penny of out-of-pocket expenses – to ask for help.
Bottom line: Cheap tricks, like garden weeds, sometimes look pretty, but they can prove expensive. Genuine efforts pay off.

A SPN Exclusive Article By Katherine Kotaw (c) 2013
  

4 comments:

  1. Google has modified the criteria of providing search results to users based on backlinks with a recent update to Panda, its search algorithm. adding backlinks to your site

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have been using Eric for about 3 months now and each month my numbers grow, and all my new students are finding me through Eric's SEO work. I couldn't be happier with Eric, he is such a good find! Thank you thank you thank you!!! seo resources

    ReplyDelete
  3. Search engine ranking report is a one touch resource which provides you a free SEO report for your website. We offer free and instant online reports of webpage rankings in the top 5 search engines: Google (top 10), Bing (top 10) and Yahoo! (top 50).

    ReplyDelete

Loading...

Labels

.net Framework and seo (1) (CSS) Working Group (24) •Tracking Preference Expression (DNT) (2) 301 redirection (1) Abstract Syntax Notation Draft (1) Accessibility (1) Adobe (1) AFRINIC (1) Agent Accessibility Guidelines (1) Alexa Rank (1) analytics (2) API for Media Resources (3) APNIC (1) App Planet (1) architecture (1) ARIN (1) Article marketing (2) ASP.NET (3) ASP.NET Routing (1) ASP.NET4 (3) ATAG (2) Audio API Specifications (1) Audio Processing API (1) audio streams (1) Audio Working Group (5) back links (4) BAD (1) Bing (2) blogger (3) bounce rate (1) browser (2) Buenas Practicas en Web Móvil (1) Candidate Recommendation (1) Canonical EXI (1) Cascading Style Sheets (6) Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Working Group (17) CCXML (2) CEA608 (1) CEA708 (1) CeBIT (1) CeBIT 2014 (1) China (1) CipherReference (1) CodedProperties (1) Comviva (1) Content (2) Content Module (1) Content Security Policy Draft (1) cryptographic (1) css (29) CSS 2D (1) CSS box (1) CSS Fonts Module (2) CSS Fonts Module Level 3 (2) CSS Print Profile (1) CSS Regions Module (1) CSS Speech Module (1) CSS Text Decoration Module (2) CSS Transforms (1) css Working Group (17) CSS3 (3) CSS3 Ruby Module (1) CSSOM (3) CSV on the Web Working Group (1) CWI (1) Danny Sullivan (1) Data Activity (5) Data Cube (1) Data Formats (1) Datability (1) datasets (1) Device and Sensors Working Group (2) Device APIs Working Group (12) DeviceOrientation Event Specification (1) DFKI (1) Digital Ink Standard (1) Digital Publishing Interest Group (2) Digital Signage (1) Directories (1) DMCA (1) DNT (4) Do Not Track (1) Do Not Track and Beyond (1) Document Object Model (DOM) (2) Document Object Model Events Level 3 (1) DOM (5) Domain Age (2) Domain Extension Time (1) Domain Name (1) DOMMatrix (1) Draft of Selectors (1) DTD (1) Dublin (1) Easy-to-Read on the Web Symposium (2) ECMAScript (1) Education and Outreach Working Group (2) Efficient XML (1) Efficient XML Interchange Working Group (1) eGovernment Activity (2) email marketing (1) EMMA (1) Emotion Markup (2) Encrypted Media Extensions (1) EOWG (3) EPUB (1) Extensible Markup Language (XML) Activity (9) Extensible Stylesheet Language (2) external links (2) Facebook (3) Facebook fans (2) Favicon.ico (1) Fonts Activity (1) Food (1) Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (1) food order (1) Forms Working Group (1) fragment identifiers (1) Free Blog Directories (1) Game development in HTML5 (1) Geolocation API Specification (3) Geolocation Working Group (3) GeoRSS (1) github (1) GML (1) google (12) Google analytics (1) Google base submission (1) Google Maps (1) Google PageRank (2) Google Places (1) google search (20) Government Linked Data Working Group (2) Graphics at W3C (1) Header Tags (2) Home Networking Scenarios (1) HTML (21) HTML Activity (7) HTML Canvas 2D Context (1) HTML Media Capture (1) HTML Working Group (11) html-css (8) html5 (26) HTML5 Audio and Video (1) HTTP (5) HTTP entity body transfers (1) IDCC11 (1) IDPF (1) IEEE floating-point decimal (1) IETF (2) IIS (1) Indexed Database API (1) Ink Markup Language (1) InkML (1) inria (1) Interaction Domain (1) Interchange Working Group (1) Interest Group Note (2) Internal link building (2) Internal links (1) International Digital Curation Conference (1) Internationalization (I18N) Core Working Group (4) Internationalization Activity (6) internet (1) ISOC (1) ITS (3) javascript (5) JLREQ (1) JSON (5) Keyword Density (1) keywords (5) Last Call (2) LDP (1) Linked Data (2) Linked Data Platform (LDP) (3) Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group (3) Linked Data Platform Use Cases and Requirements (1) Linked Enterprise Data Patterns (1) Linking Geospatial Data (2) Live Video Stream (1) Local search engine (7) Lyon City Hall (1) Math Activity (1) Math Working Group (1) MBUI (3) media advisory (3) Media Annotations Working Group (4) Media Capture and Streams (2) Media Fragments URI 1.0 (1) Media Queries (1) Media Resources (3) Media Type Definitions (1) MediaScape (1) Meetup (1) Meta Data (1) Meta Description (1) meta tag (5) Metadata for the Multilingual Web (1) Microsoft (1) MMI Architecture (1) Mobile (1) Mobile Web and Application (2) Mobile Web Best Practices (2) MobiWebApp (3) Model-Based User Interfaces Working Group (3) multilingual audience (1) Multilingual Web (2) MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group (5) multimedia integration (1) Multimodal Interaction Activity (1) Multimodal Interaction Working Group (4) Namespaces Module (1) Navigation Timing (2) Navigation Timing 2 (1) network (1) Networked Service Discovery and Messaging (1) NFC (2) NFC Working Group (1) nterchange (EXI) (2) NTT (1) ODF (1) OGC (2) online order (1) Online Privacy (1) Online Symposium (1) Ontology (1) Open Data Conference (2) Open Knowledge Foundation (1) Open Task Forces (1) Open Web Platform Performance Priorities (2) Open Web Technology (1) openworldforum (1) organic search listings (4) Orientation Sensor (1) OWL 2 (1) OWL2 (1) PAG (3) PAG charter (2) Page description (1) page icon (1) Page Loading (1) Page Rank (1) paid search listings (3) Penguin (1) Penguin 2.0 (2) Performance Timeline (3) PFWG (3) Pick Media Intent (1) Plenary Day (1) Points of Interest (1) PPC (1) Princeton University (1) products and services (1) Progress Events (2) Protocols and Formats Working Group (PFWG) (6) PROV Data (1) PROV Data Model (1) PROV Model Primer (1) PROV-DM (1) Provenance Working Group (1) Proximity Events (2) Publishing and Linking on the Web (1) Publishing Working Group (1) Push API (3) RDF (15) RDF Working Group (7) RDF/OWL (1) RDFa Working Group (2) RDWG (1) Reciprocal linking (3) register now (2) Registered Organization Vocabulary (1) registration (2) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG) (1) Réseaux (1) Resource Timing (2) Responsive Web Design (2) Rich Web Client Activity (27) RIF (1) RIF frames (1) RIPE NCC (1) Robots.txt (1) Role Attribute (2) Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 (2) Schema (1) Script-Based Animations (1) SCXML (3) search engine (5) Search Engine Marketing (8) Search Engine Marketing Tips (4) Search Engine Optimization (26) search engines (11) Security Activity (8) Security Policy (1) Selection API (1) Selectors (1) Selectors API Level 2 (2) SEM (2) Semantic Sensor Network XG (1) Semantic Web (6) Semantic Web Activity (11) Semantic Web Interest Group (2) SEO (42) seo advice (9) seo analysis (8) seo and w3c Validation (2) seo cms (1) seo for cms (1) SEO Optimization (1) SEO ranking factors (3) SEO Tasks (8) SEO Tips (17) seo tools (3) SERP (1) Shorten urls (1) Simple Delivery Profile for Closed Captions (1) single digital market (1) Site Speed (1) SOAP (1) SOAP over Java Message (1) SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group (1) Social (2) social business (2) Social Media (2) SPARQL (2) SPARQL Working Group (1) Spatial Data (2) Spider (1) SSN ontology (1) State Chart XML (SCXML) (1) storage quota management (2) Style Activity (30) stylesheets (1) SVG (10) System Applications Working Group (1) Technical Architecture Group (2) Television Convergence (1) The WebSocket API (1) Timed Text Working Group (5) Timing Control (1) tionalization Activity (1) Title Meta Tags (3) title tag (3) Title Tags (4) Touch Events (1) Touch Events Patent Advisory Group (PAG) (3) TPAC (3) TPAC 2012 (2) Transforms Specification (1) TriG (2) TTML (3) TV broadcasters (1) Twaweza (1) Twitter (1) UAAG (1) UAWG (1) Ubiquitous Web Applications Activity (20) Ubiquitous Web Domain (2) UNESCO (1) Unicode (1) url Rewrite (1) URL Rewriting (2) URL Shortener (1) Use Cases & Requirements (1) User Agent Accessibility (1) User Interface Safety Directives for Content Security Policy (1) User Timing (1) Validator (1) vCard (2) Video in the Web Activity (8) Visibility (1) Vocabularies for EmotionML (1) Voice Browser Activity (3) Voice Browser Call Control (1) Voice Browser Working Group (3) w3c (113) W3C Advisory (4) W3C Announce (24) W3C Certificate (2) W3C Co-organizes (1) W3C community (5) w3c compliance (3) w3c Cource (3) w3c Course (2) W3C Data Activity (1) W3C Digital (2) W3C Graphics Activity (12) W3C Mobile (3) W3C MultilingualWeb Workshop (1) W3C Multimodal Interaction (2) w3c Notes (7) W3C Office (1) W3C online training course (2) W3C online training courses (1) W3C online training for developers (1) W3C Patent Policy (1) W3C Privacy Activity (4) W3C Recomendation (2) W3C Recommendation (6) w3c Release (69) W3C Social Business (2) W3C staff (1) w3c standards (4) W3C SVG Working Group (11) W3C track (1) W3C Tracking Protection Working Group (5) W3C Training (2) w3c Updates (15) w3c Validator (10) W3C Web (2) W3C Workshop (8) W3C/MobiWebApp (2) W3Conf (2) W3Cx (1) W3DevCampus (5) WADEX (1) WAI (9) WAI home page (3) WAI-ARIA (5) WCAG (3) WCAG 2.0 (1) WCAG WG (2) WCAG2ICT (1) WCF (1) Web Accessibility Initiative (6) Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (13) Web and Mobile Devices (3) Web and Television (1) Web and TV (1) Web and TV Convergence (1) Web Annotation Working Group (2) Web API Design Cookbook (1) Web Application Security Working Group (2) Web Applications (4) Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group (1) Web Applications Working Group (14) Web Apps specifications (1) Web Architecture (1) Web Audio API (4) Web Audio Processing: Use Cases and Requirements (1) Web Best Practices Working Group (2) Web Content (2) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (3) Web Cryptography API (3) Web Cryptography Working Group (4) Web Design and Applications (1) Web Designing (1) Web developers (2) web development (4) Web Events Working Group (1) web hosting (2) Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (1) Web IDL (1) Web Intents (1) Web Intents Task Force (1) Web MIDI API (1) Web NFC API (1) Web Notification Working Group (1) Web Notifications (1) Web Ontology Language (1) web page title (5) Web Performance Working Group (5) web portal (1) Web Real-Time Communications Working Group (8) Web Schemas (1) Web standards (1) Web Testing Activity (1) Web Testing Interest Group (1) Web Tracking (1) Web WG (1) Web Working Group (1) Web-based Signage Business Group (1) WebCrypto Key Discovery (2) WebFonts Working Group (1) webmaster (2) WebRTC 1.0 (2) widget package (1) Windows Communication Foundation (1) WOFF (2) Working Draft (2) Working Drafts (1) Working Group (1) workshop (2) Workshop on Web Performance (1) Workshop Report (1) World Wide Web (1) WSDL (1) WWW (1) XDM (1) XForms 2.0 (1) XForms Activity (1) XHTML (12) XHTML 1.1 (1) XHTML 2.0 (1) XHTML Print (1) XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and RDFa Core 1.1 (5) XLIFF (3) XML (23) XML (SCXML) (1) XML Activity (2) XML Core Working Group (2) XML Digital Signatures (2) XML documents (2) XML Encryption (1) XML markup (1) XML Query Working Group (5) XML Schema (2) XML Schema Working Group (2) XML Technology (1) XPath (4) XQuery (7) XQuery Working Group (1) XSD (2) XSD datatype (1) XSL-FO (1) XSLT (4) XSLT Working Group (5)